Drug possession charges in Maryland carry severe consequences, making it crucial for individuals facing such accusations to understand their rights and the possible defenses available to them. The legal landscape surrounding drug possession is complex, but with a thorough understanding and strategic defense, it is possible to mitigate the impact of these charges. This comprehensive guide explores various defenses to drug possession charges in Maryland, aiming to provide clarity and guidance to those navigating these challenging circumstances.
Understanding Drug Possession Laws in Maryland
To effectively defend against drug possession charges, it is essential to grasp the intricacies of Maryland’s drug laws. The state classifies controlled substances into different schedules based on their potential for abuse and accepted medical use. These schedules range from Schedule I, which includes substances with a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, to Schedule V, which encompasses drugs with a lower potential for abuse and accepted medical uses. Understanding the classification of the substance in question is critical, as the penalties and potential defenses can vary significantly.
Unlawful Search and Seizure
One of the most common and effective defenses to drug possession charges is challenging the legality of the search and seizure that led to the discovery of the drugs. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. If law enforcement officers conducted an unlawful search or seizure, any evidence obtained as a result may be deemed inadmissible in court. For instance, if the police conducted a search without a valid warrant, or if the warrant was defective, the defense can argue that the evidence should be excluded. Additionally, if the officers exceeded the scope of the search warrant or conducted the search without probable cause, this can also serve as a basis for challenging the admissibility of the evidence.
Founding Partner Founding Partner Attorney Attorney
Andrew D. Alpert
Michael J. Schreyer
Michael Berman
Jason Miller
Lack of Possession
To secure a conviction for drug possession, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had control over the substance. This control can be either actual, where the drugs are found on the person, or constructive, where the drugs are found in a place over which the defendant has dominion and control. A defense based on lack of possession argues that the defendant did not have control over the drugs in question. For instance, if the drugs were found in a shared space, such as a car or apartment, the defense can argue that there is no definitive proof that the defendant was aware of the drugs or had control over them.
Mistaken Identity
Mistaken identity is another viable defense in drug possession cases, particularly in situations where multiple individuals are present at the scene. If the drugs were found in a location accessible to several people, it might be challenging for the prosecution to prove that the defendant was the one in possession of the substances. This defense can be particularly effective when there is a lack of direct evidence linking the defendant to the drugs, such as fingerprints or DNA. By casting doubt on the prosecution’s ability to establish the defendant’s possession of the drugs, the defense can undermine the credibility of the charges.
With criminal charges starting at age 18 and I’m now 45 I recently got a subsequent charge. Working hard at family and work life over the years this would have ruined it all. Stressed to the max I searched for the person who could do what others couldn’t. They structured a plan for me and I walked today from court. Being no stranger to the courtroom he was more than impressive, he owned it. Be honest with him, do what he says and you will no doubt be in the best possible position you could be in when you walk in with him. From the bottom of heart I thank you and your team for all that you did!” - Ryan W.
Lack of Knowledge
In some cases, the defense can argue that the defendant was unaware of the presence of the drugs. For a possession charge to hold, the prosecution must prove that the defendant knowingly possessed the controlled substance. If the defendant can demonstrate that they were unaware of the drugs’ existence, this can serve as a strong defense. For example, if the defendant borrowed a car and was unaware that the previous driver had left drugs in the vehicle, the defense can argue that the defendant did not knowingly possess the drugs.
Medical Marijuana Exception
Maryland has specific laws regarding the medical use of marijuana, which can serve as a defense for individuals facing possession charges related to marijuana. Under Maryland law, individuals with a valid medical marijuana card and a legitimate medical need for marijuana can possess a certain amount of the substance without facing criminal charges. If the defendant can prove that they have a valid medical marijuana card and that their possession falls within the legal limits, this can serve as a complete defense to the charges.
Entrapment
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers induce an individual to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. This defense can be particularly relevant in drug possession cases where undercover officers or informants have persuaded the defendant to possess or purchase drugs. To successfully assert an entrapment defense, the defendant must demonstrate that the idea to commit the crime originated with law enforcement and that they were not predisposed to commit the crime. If the defense can show that the defendant was pressured or coerced into possessing the drugs, this can serve as a strong basis for dismissing the charges.
Steps to Take if You Were Arrested Today Probable CauseRelated Videos
Chain of Custody Issues
The chain of custody refers to the documented and unbroken transfer of evidence from the time it is seized to its presentation in court. Any gaps or discrepancies in the chain of custody can call into question the integrity of the evidence. In drug possession cases, the defense can challenge the prosecution’s ability to establish a clear and unbroken chain of custody for the drugs. If the defense can demonstrate that there were issues with how the evidence was handled, stored, or transferred, this can undermine the prosecution’s case and potentially lead to the exclusion of the evidence.
Insufficient Evidence
In any criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In drug possession cases, this means that the prosecution must present sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed the controlled substance. The defense can challenge the sufficiency of the evidence by arguing that the prosecution has not met this burden. For instance, if the only evidence is the defendant’s proximity to the drugs, without any direct evidence linking the defendant to the possession, the defense can argue that the prosecution has not provided enough proof to sustain a conviction.
Lab Analysis Errors
Drug possession cases often rely heavily on the results of laboratory analysis to confirm the nature and quantity of the substance in question. The defense can challenge the accuracy and reliability of the lab analysis by examining the procedures followed during the testing process. Any errors, inconsistencies, or deviations from standard protocols can cast doubt on the validity of the results. For instance, if the lab technician failed to properly calibrate the equipment or if there was contamination of the samples, the defense can argue that the lab results are unreliable and should be excluded from evidence.
Verdicts & Settlements
Constitutional Violations
Drug possession charges can be challenged on the grounds of constitutional violations, such as violations of the defendant’s right to due process or equal protection under the law. For example, if the defendant’s rights were violated during the arrest, such as being denied the right to an attorney or not being informed of their rights, this can serve as a basis for challenging the charges. Additionally, if the defendant can demonstrate that they were targeted or discriminated against based on race, ethnicity, or another protected characteristic, this can also serve as a defense.
Coercion or Duress
In some cases, the defendant may argue that they were forced to possess the drugs due to threats or coercion. This defense, known as duress, requires the defendant to prove that they were under immediate threat of serious harm or death and that they had no reasonable opportunity to escape the situation. For instance, if an individual was forced at gunpoint to carry drugs, the defense can argue that the defendant did not willingly possess the drugs and should not be held criminally liable.
Fighting for You
Facing drug possession charges in Maryland can be a daunting and overwhelming experience. However, understanding the available defenses and working with an attorney can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Alpert Schreyer, LLC is committed to providing comprehensive legal representation for individuals facing drug possession charges. Our experienced attorneys will meticulously examine the details of your case, identify potential defenses, and advocate vigorously on your behalf.
If you or a loved one is facing drug possession charges, do not hesitate to reach out to Alpert Schreyer, LLC for a consultation. Our team is dedicated to protecting your rights and securing the best possible outcome for your case. Contact us today to discuss your situation and explore your legal options.